Three proposals for Humber Gap

City staff have come up with three proposals to close the Humber Gap—the missing part of the recreational trail between Cruickshank Park and Crawford–Jones Memorial Park.

The Humber Gap is a royal pain. It divides the wonderful, long path that runs to Lake Ontario (and beyond) from 30 km of trails to the north—and “is a discontinuity in the future Loop Trail, a 65 km off road, multi-use ring that will connect multiple ravines, neighbourhoods and trail systems throughout Toronto.”

But boy, is it a tough problem to solve. There is a railway, a river, a bridge, an arterial road, landowners, and an expensive private golf course. There are no simple solutions.

City staff have come up with three complicated ones.

The first would impinge on the private landowners and golf course, but create a lovely, entirely off-road path with two boardwalks crossing the river.

From the city presentation

Bike and foot traffic would no longer have to climb up the stairs and fend with the dangerous traffic squeezed close by the railway bridge. But, as staff note, it would impinge on the golf course and a land trust.

The second option is much worse from the point of view of a trail user. Instead of crossing and re-crossing the river, there would be a cantilevered trail and a boardwalk on the east side of the river, and there would be no conflict with the golf course. The path would run alongside the trail on Metrolinx property into the ravine

From the city

However, trail users would still be forced up and out of the valley, and under the extremely unpleasant, narrow, railway bridge. It would also be expensive.

The third option is the worst for trail users and a pain for drivers. (It’s my money for what we’ll get, too.) It is roughly what we have now, but with a proper bike lane on Weston Road instead of weakling sharrows.

From the city

The bike path would impinge on the sidewalk under the bridge and could force narrower lanes there, too, where traffic is, honestly, already pretty awful. Further along, Weston could lose a lane of traffic.

This plan is, however, cheap.

Author: Adam Norman

I am raising my two children in Weston.

3 thoughts on “Three proposals for Humber Gap”

  1. Weston always gets the cheap end of the stick as you can tell from all the lovely development in our community.

  2. Such a shame that this wasn’t dealt with immediately following Hurricane Hazel. Depressing how this has been talked and thought about for ages, with such little traction.

    There is absolutely no way option #1 gets done without some sort of public rallying effort. The outlook shouldn’t be “for people of Weston”, and should be “for all of Toronto”. Yes – it would be costly, but it would be for the best in the long run.

    As anyone who travels on Weston or St. Philips knows, that area is hit or miss for crazy traffic. Putting in bike lanes would near certainly make it so much worse. Having a climb out of the valley would not be a problem for able bodied riders with decent gear ratios, but would certainly be more challenging for so many others.

    I’d consider it a miracle if #1 happened. I just can’t see there being the political will.

Comments are closed.